Driving Development through Smart Village in Tripura: An Overview

Rupak Biswas, Bindu Ranjan Chakma

Abstract


Rural areas are home to the vast majority of Indians. Most Indian rural villages struggle with various challenges to accelerate rural development. They lack basic health care, education, and other infrastructure facilities. Rural India experiences the impact of global warming and climate change affecting the social and economic life of the people. Tripura, a tiny state in Northeast India, is also no exception to this. As per the census data of 2011, 73.83% of its population lives in rural villages. Like most rural villages in India, the rural villages in Tripura also face similar problems and challenges. It aims to transform rural villages into viable growth centres. The concept of a Smart Village can be a useful perspective to address the major rural problems in India. In the current study two rural villages-Punsari Smart Village located in Sabarkanta district of Gujarat, and Chantail Village, a non-smart village of Unokoti district in Tripura are taken up in order to understand the development dynamics in the smart and non-smart villages of rural India. Current study is basedon a survey conducted from June to September 2022 with 20 villagers from each ward of Chantail village of Unakoti District. To conduct the research , field observation and semi-structured interview methods were used during the survey to collect first-hand information. This study aims to reveal that in terms of providing services to the residents of villages, Chantail village is lagging far behind the Punsari smart village. This is largely due to the absence of a smart village concept in Tripura. Moreover, this paper is attempt to draw the attention of the policy makers of Tripura for sustainably accelerating rural development by focusing on the vitality of smart village.


Keywords


Social inequalities, Environmental concerns, Smart village, Sustainable development, Rural development

Full Text:

PDF

References


R.Pearson (2018). Traditional Development Theories have Failed to Address the Needs of Majority of People at Grass roots Level with Reference to GAD. International Journal of Business and Social Science, USA , Vol.9.,

Dulyley Seers (1969), The Meaning of Development, IDS Communication 44, Brightan:IDS. Also see, Dudley Seers, (1972), Economic Growth: What Are We Trying to Measure? In N.Baster (ed.), Measuring Development: The Role and Adequacy of Development Indicators, London: Frank Cass.

Alan Thomas, (2000), Developoment as Practice in a Liberal Capitalist World’, Journal of International Development, 12(6):773-787

The Declaration on the Right to Development as adopted by in its resolution 41/126 of December 1986.https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-right-development. Retrieved on 17/02/2023.

Amartya Sen, (1999), Developmet as Freedom, Newyork: Oxford University Press, p. 3

Michael Paul Todaro (1981), Economic Development in the Thrid World, (2nd ed.), New York:Longman, p. 56.

Prateek Goorha, (2010) Modernization Theory, published in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia, International Relations, DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626013266. For details, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301731821_Modernization_Theory, retrieved on 17/02/2023.

JohnBrohman (1996), Popular Development: Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Development, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.,, P. 20.

Robert BAnderson (2003), Indigenous Peoples Community Development in New Global Economy: The Search for a Theoritical Perspective, a paper presented at the CommEnt Research Symposium, University of New Castle, February 3-4, p.4.

D. R. Abuiyada (2018). Traditional Development Theories have failed to Address the Needs of the majority of People at Grassroots Levels with Reference to GAD. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 9, No. 9 , 115-119.

Bindu Ranjan Chakma (2019), Environmental Administration: Concepts, Issues and Challenges, Delhi: B. B. Publishing House, 2019, pp. 3-4.

IFOAM Organic international, 2020. For details, https://www.ifoam.bio/news/our-2020-annual-report-now-available, retrived on 15/10/2022.

Chakma, Bindu Ranjan Chakma, Environmental Conflict Resolution: A Gandhian Perspective, Adhyayan, a peer reviewed referred journal, Maharaja Bir Bikram University, Vol. 1, Issue 1, March 2021, pp. 82-87.

Ibid; p. 86.

A A Aziiza (2020). The Smart Village Model for Rural Area (Case Study: Banyuwangi Regency). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (pp. 1-9). IOP Publishing.Rutuja Somwanshi, U. S. (2016). Study and development of village as a smart village . International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7 , 395-408.

A. S.Patel (2018). Achieving Inclusive Development Through Smart Village. PDPU Journal of Energy and Management, Vol,3 , 37-43.

P.S. Pratima Tiwari ( 2018 ), Smart Village–an Approach for Sustainable Villages in New Initiative in Agriculture and Rural Development (pp. 102-110). Zittau, Germany : Weser Books..D. P.Shukla (2016). The Indian Smart Village: Foundation for Growing India. International Journal of Applied Research , 72-74.

IFOAM Organic international. (2020, March 03). Retrieved March o3, 2021, from https://ifoam.bio/why-organic/organic-landmarks/definition-organic.

D. C Debotosh (2019). Democratic Decentralisation, Political Parties and Gram Panchayats: Evidence from Assam and Tripura. International Journal of research in Social Sciences, volueme:9 , 491-505.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


*The views, interpretations and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and may not necessarily be of JDP.


Number of Visitors to this Journal: web counter

 The Journal is indexed with Cosmos Impact Factor  Â