Simulated Conflict Based Safety Evaluation Models for Hetergenous Traffic in Controlled Intersections

Nayeem Islam, Md. Omar Faruk

Abstract


In this paper, an attempt is made to investigate how traffic conflicts identified from microsimulation models can be correlated with explanatory variables which have been traditionally used in accident prediction models. In developing countries with heterogenous traffic streams, availability of accident data is limited especially since accidents are rare events.  Such traffic streams normally have some unique attributes like absence of lane discipline, presence of non-motorized vehicles. In urban intersections with such slow-moving traffic streams, conflicts are more useful determinants of intersection safety rather than previous records of accidents since geometry of intersection may be changed from the time to time. Simulated conflict-based safety evaluation models were developed for intersections of Dhaka city. The intersections were modeled in VISSIM after suitable calibration, for 8 hours of peak hour traffic. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM) was used to identify the corresponding simulated hourly conflicts from the resulting trajectory files. It was found that hourly simulated conflicts had a significant statistical relationship with observed hourly traffic volume entering the intersection from major and minor roads. Increasing volumes of non-motorized traffic was found to contribute to intersection safety.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Elvik, R., Vaa, T., Erke, A., & Sorensen, M. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of road safety measures. Emerald Group Publishing.

Chen, P., Zeng, W., & Yu, G. (2019). Assessing right-turning vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at intersections using an integrated microscopic simulation model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 129, 211-224.

Guo, Y., Essa, M., Sayed, T., Haque, M. M., & Washington, S. (2019). A comparison between simulated and field-measured conflicts for safety assessment of signalized intersections in Australia.

Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 101, 96-110.

Amundsen, F., and Hyden, C. (1977). Proc., 1st Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway.

Gettman, D., Pu, L., Sayed, T., & Shelby, S. G. (2008). Surrogate safety assessment model and validation: Final report (No. FHWA-HRT-08-051).

Huang, F., Liu, P., Yu, H., & Wang, W. (2013). Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 1014-1024. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.018

Cunto, F., & Saccomanno, F. F. (2008). Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(3), 1171-1179. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.003

Saleem, T., Persaud, B., Shalaby, A., & Ariza, A. (2014). Can Microscopicsimulation Be Used to Estimate Intersection Safety? Case Studies Using VISSIM and Paramics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2432), 142-148.doi: 10.3141/2432-17

Caliendo, C., & Guida, M. (2012). Microscopicsimulation approach for predicting crashes at unsignalized intersections using traffic conflicts. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138(12), 1453-1467.doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000473

Ozbay, K., Yang, H., Bartin, B., & Mudigonda, S. (2008). Derivation and validation of new simulation-based surrogate safety measure. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2083), 105-113.doi: 10.3141/2083-12

Archer, J., & Young, W. (2009). Signal treatments to reduce the likelihood of heavy vehicle crashes at intersections: Microscopicsimulation modeling approach.Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136(7), 632-639.doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000125

Nezamuddin, N., Jiang, N., Ma, J., Zhang, T., & Waller, S. T. (2011). Active traffic management strategies: implications for freeway operations and traffic safety. In Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting (No. 11-3091).

Habtemichael, F. G., & de Picado Santos, L. (2012). Safety evaluations of aggressive driving on motorways through microscopic traffic simulation and surrogate measures. In Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting (No. 12-2011).

Mathew, T. V., & Radhakrishnan, P. (2010). Calibration of microscopicsimulation models for nonlane-based heterogeneous traffic at signalized intersections.Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(1), 59-66. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:1(59)

PTV VISSIM 7.0 User Manual, 2014. PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG, Karlsruhe. Germany.

Sayed, T., Brown, G., & Navin, F. (1994). Simulation of traffic conflicts at unsignalized intersections with TSC-Sim. Accident Analysis & Prevention,26(5), 593-607. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(94)90021-3

Tiwari, G., Mohan, D., & Fazio, J. (1998). Conflict analysis for prediction of fatal crash locations in mixed traffic streams. Accident Analysis & Prevention,30(2), 207-215. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00082-1

Olmstead, T. (2001). Freeway management systems and motor vehicle crashes: a case study of Phoenix, Arizona. Accident Analysis & Prevention,33(4), 433-447. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00057-9

Chin, H. C., & Quddus, M. A. (2003). Applying the random effect negative binomial model to examine traffic accident occurrence at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(2), 253-259. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00003-9


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The ADBU Journal of Engineering Technology (AJET)" ISSN:2348-7305

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/)

Number of Visitors to this Journal: